Night School: The Life-Changing Science of Sleep
Richard Wiseman
Psychologist Richard Wiseman gathers quick, research-tested techniques for planning goals, being liked, generating ideas, easing hurt, strengthening relationships and spotting lies, and shows why some popular advice, like picturing success, can backfire.

1 min 01 sec
If you want to be more creative, more persuasive or better at love, the usual advice is to dig deep and wait years. In 59 Seconds, psychologist and former magician Richard Wiseman argues that some of that advice backfires: students who spent a few moments a day imagining a top grade studied less and scored lower. His case is that small, research-tested moves, many taking under a minute, often do more than slow self-improvement or pleasant fantasies.
Wiseman tells of a repairman who fixes a stubborn boiler with a single tap and charges for knowing where to tap. Psychology research, he suggests, now tells the rest of us where to tap. What follows are those spots: how to turn a goal into something that survives setbacks, how to be liked in an interview, where good ideas come from, how to recover from a hurt, what keeps couples together and how to notice when someone is lying.
1 min 40 sec
Picturing your dream outcome feels motivating, and a whole industry sells it. A study of students before an exam suggests that same pleasant picture may be draining the effort it promises to create.
1 min 40 sec
Most candidates polish their qualifications and rehearse their strengths. Researchers who tracked new graduates found a different factor deciding who got hired, and an old recording about school cheating shows when to admit a flaw.
1 min 39 sec
A spilled glass of juice beat a flawless product demonstration on one important measure. The catch is that this works only for certain people, and a common office habit can turn others against you.
1 min 38 sec
Group brainstorming feels productive, with its buzz and full whiteboards. An old experiment with a rope and some heavy weights, and a painter holding a spoon, point toward better places to look for ideas.
1 min 44 sec
Writing a few lines about a rebellious stranger made people score higher on a creativity test. A cheaper change to an office did something similar, and neither takes more than a minute to arrange.
1 min 35 sec
After a breakup or a betrayal, distraction is the usual escape, and it works for an hour. Students who tried a different few minutes of writing handled their anger better, and the effect reaches darker places too.
1 min 44 sec
One researcher counted kind and critical remarks between partners and found a ratio that predicts which couples last. A short writing exercise and a single ordinary word made a measurable difference too.
1 min 43 sec
Shifty eyes, fidgeting and nervous stories are what most people watch for. Students who lied about their grades showed none of that, and the real signs look more like someone solving a math problem.
1 min 05 sec
The boiler repairman’s single tap fits this book well. Wiseman’s argument is that researchers have already done the years of training, and what they hand back is often small enough to fit inside a minute: a weakness admitted early, a plant on the desk, the word but in the middle of a complaint. Several findings also cut against habit. Picturing success can lower effort, groups can shrink the number of ideas, and the nervous, fidgeting liar is mostly a myth.
Knowing where to tap still starts with knowing what you want. Wiseman offers an exercise for that: write your own eulogy. Imagining the way you hope others will recall you, he says, can expose what you truly want. Turn the largest of them into a plan of small steps and tell someone about it. Then choose one quick change from the rest, perhaps five kind remarks for every critical one at home, or a few minutes of thinking alone before the next meeting.
None of it takes long. It only takes knowing exactly where to tap.
Self-improvement often sounds slow and expensive: years of effort, long courses, endless positive thinking. Richard Wiseman, a psychologist who began as a magician, argues that much of it can be done in about a minute, as long as you know which small action the research supports. He compares psychology to a repairman who fixes a broken boiler with one tap because training told him exactly where to tap. Wiseman then points to those spots across daily life. He explains why imagining success can lower effort, why candidates who are liked get hired, why a competent person's small mistake makes them more appealing, and why people working alone often produce more ideas than groups. He covers priming and plants for creativity, finding benefits in painful events, the ratio of kind to critical comments in lasting couples, and the real signs that someone is lying. Readers get a set of short, concrete techniques to try at work and at home, many of them drawn from psychological studies.
Job seekers and young professionals who want to be liked in interviews and at work.
Managers who run brainstorms and want better ideas from their teams.
Partners, and anyone recovering from a hurt, who want short exercises backed by named studies.
Richard Wiseman worked as a professional magician before studying psychology at University College London and earning a doctorate at the University of Edinburgh. He is professor of the public understanding of psychology at the University of Hertfordshire, researching luck, self-help, persuasion and illusion. His best-selling books, translated into more than 30 languages, include Night School and Quirkology. He has spoken at the Royal Society and Google and created the YouTube channels Quirkology and In59Seconds.
Richard Wiseman
Richard Wiseman
Listeners find this book accessible and engaging, offering evidence-based perspectives on daily life. They appreciate the actionable suggestions and useful techniques for self-improvement, with one listener mentioning it acts as a manual for significant areas of life. The text is well-crafted and brief, and listeners value the way it relies on actual scientific research.
Ever wonder why positive thinking cults keep failing people while charging exorbitant workshop fees? Wiseman dismantles that entire industry with wit, clinical precision, and verifiable psychology. Suppressing negative thoughts is like trying not to think of a pink elephant; it backfires spectacularly. Instead of vague affirmations, this book delivers genuinely useful micro-actions supported by published data. Want to ace an interview? Disclose your minor shortcomings right at the start to seem grounded, while saving notable strengths for the finish line. Planning a memorable first date? Skip the silent candlelit dinner and head straight for a rollercoaster where shared adrenaline boosts natural attraction. The prose moves at a blistering pace, free of academic jargon. Brilliant, refreshingly practical, and immensely fun to read.
Show moreMost personal development books demand months of meditation or drastic habit overhauls, but Richard Wiseman takes the exact opposite approach. He sifts through psychological literature to unearth tiny, instantaneous behavioral shifts that yield disproportionate psychological dividends. Writing down your feelings for just a couple of minutes to defuse emotional baggage, or positioning a baby photo in your wallet to boost the odds of it being returned if lost, are brilliant examples of everyday behavioral engineering. His background as an illusionist gives him a sharp eye for the ways human brains mislead themselves. Gotta say, this book permanently altered how I approach problem-solving and goal tracking. Essential reading for skeptics who still want to optimize their daily routines.
Show morePicked this up on a friend's recommendation and ended up bookmarking half the practical experiments. Unlike bloated motivational titles that demand total lifestyle overhauls, Wiseman’s focus centers on micro-interventions grounded in academic research. Truth is, small behavioral tweaks often work far better than grand resolutions. I especially appreciated the research showing that praising a child's effort rather than their innate intelligence fosters long-term resilience. The facial feedback tip—holding a pencil between your teeth to force a smile—sounds completely ridiculous until you try it during a miserable afternoon slump. My only gripe lies with the frequent self-assessment questionnaires scattered across the chapters, which interrupt the prose and feel a bit gimmicky. Nevertheless, the actionable takeaways make this well worth your time.
Show moreAfter wading through endless fluffy self-help manuals, Wiseman’s focus on peer-reviewed psychological experiments felt like a breath of crisp air. He strips away mystical nonsense and addresses common problems—procrastination, social awkwardness, lack of creativity—using controlled behavioral observations. The advice on handling creative blocks was revelatory: stop straining at your desk and deliberately distract your conscious mind with a routine puzzle so subconscious associations can assemble uninterrupted. Admittedly, some experiments lean heavily on quirky, small-scale university cohorts, which makes you wonder how well every single finding replicates in messy, everyday life. Look, even with minor skepticism, the practical value is undeniable. It is a concise, highly readable toolkit for self-improvement that respects the reader's intelligence.
Show moreThis book delivers exactly what the title promises: sixty-second psychological hacks without the spiritual nonsense. Adding a potted plant to an office desk to stimulate creative problem-solving sounds absurdly simple, yet the study behind it makes total sense. Wiseman writes with dry British charm, keeping chapters punchy and directly applicable. A few arguments feel somewhat rushed to fit the concise format. Even so, the sheer volume of useful, evidence-based nuggets makes it an exceptional desk reference for everyday dilemmas.
Show moreColor me surprised: sticking a pencil between your teeth really does nudge your brain toward a better mood. Wiseman’s exploration of the facial feedback hypothesis demonstrates how physical actions instruct mental states rather than the other way around. The book excels whenever it turns common assumptions on their head, particularly the myth that venting reduces rage. The advice is digestible, engaging, and delightfully rapid. Sometimes the leap from a laboratory scenario to general everyday application feels a bit stretched, but the exercises are completely harmless to test on yourself. It serves as an entertaining manual for running personal experiments on your own brain.
Show moreRichard Wiseman has crafted a wonderfully compact antidote to pop-psychology folklore. Rather than recycling exhausted clichés about visualization, he explains why visualizing the agonizing process of completing a project generates far better outcomes than daydreaming about the final victory. The strategies for spotting dishonesty in digital communication versus face-to-face conversations are remarkably astute. While certain studies cited would struggle to survive modern replication scrutiny, the broad behavioral frameworks remain dependable. It is accessible, smartly organized, and packed with practical wisdom that takes virtually no time to implement.
Show moreThe chapter debunking venting anger—showing how pummeling pillows actually elevates hostility rather than purging it—was easily the highlight here. Wiseman compiles several clever behavioral counter-intuitions throughout these pages. You learn why group brainstorming sessions choke original thinking, and how placing an ordinary mirror near a buffet table curtails junk food binging. In my experience, though, the relationship chapters feel somewhat dated and overly reliant on rigid, heteronormative bar-scene dynamics where men chase and women react. The overarching concept remains decent. You receive bite-sized psychological summaries at the conclusion of every section that genuinely take under a minute to digest. It functions well as light, conversational non-fiction, provided you keep your expectations grounded.
Show moreNot what I expected from the audio edition, mostly because the text relies so heavily on interactive checklists. Hearing someone read multiple-choice personality grids aloud becomes tedious within the first twenty minutes. The core content itself offers solid, intriguing psychology. Wiseman does a fine job demonstrating how deceptive individuals rely less on self-referential words like 'me' and overload their speech with filler. Frankly, the sixty-second summaries are clever, but the audiobook format simply fails to accommodate them cleanly without supplementary PDF handouts. If you plan to explore these techniques, buy a physical copy so you can skim the questionnaires and focus straight on the empirical takeaways.
Show moreAs someone drawn to empirical science, I went into this expecting rigorous skepticism, but came away disappointed by the methodology. Wiseman rightly mocks the absurdities of positive visualization and the broader self-help industry. However, the alternative research he presents often feels equally flimsy. Entire behavioral theories get built upon tiny sample sizes, such as dropping forty wallets with baby pictures to measure return rates, or the questionable hotel housekeeper exercise experiment. To be fair, the writing style is brisk and engaging. His critique of pop-psychology myths makes for entertaining reading during a commute. Still, exchanging untested folklore for poorly controlled laboratory studies does not equate to solid science. If you scrutinize the footnotes, you will notice just how many grand life conclusions rest on shaky, un-replicated undergraduate trials.
Show moreWiseman argues that many improvements in work, mood and relationships come from quick techniques tested by psychologists, not from years of effort. Some popular advice even backfires: students who imagined getting a high grade studied less and scored lower. He offers short alternatives, such as making a step-by-step plan, admitting a weakness early in an interview, thinking alone before group meetings and softening criticism of a partner with the word but.
Not on its own, in Wiseman’s view. In a University of California study, students who briefly pictured a high grade each day studied fewer hours and earned lower marks than students who did nothing. The researchers think fantasizing leaves people unprepared for setbacks. Wiseman found that people who reached goals like losing weight or quitting smoking had a plan, broken into subgoals, and he recommends telling friends and family about it.
Wiseman says nerves are a poor guide, since liars in a University of Southampton study were no more stressed than honest students. Lying takes mental effort, so liars often gesture less, answer more slowly and pause more. They tend to avoid words like I, me and mine, turn impersonal and deflect with questions. He also mentions research from Cornell showing that lying is 20 percent less common in email.
Wiseman draws on John Gottman’s finding that lasting couples make about five positive comments for every negative one. He also describes a University of Texas study where couples who wrote about their relationship for 20 minutes on three days were more likely to stay together. And he cites Sandra Murray and John Holmes, whose lasting couples softened criticism with but, as in lazy but funny.
It suits busy people who want practical psychology without a long program: job seekers preparing for interviews, managers who run brainstorming sessions, couples who want small habits that support their relationship, and anyone dealing with a painful event. Each technique is tied to a specific study, from blender demonstrations to office plants, and most can be tried in a minute or two.
Deborah Gruenfeld
Anthony Pratkanis
William B. Irvine
AUDIO SUMMARY AVAILABLE
Get the key ideas from 59 Seconds by Richard Wiseman, plus 5,000+ more nonfiction titles.
