Opens in a new tab
14 min 38 sec
Available in:English

Them: Why We Hate Each Other – and How to Heal

Explains why Americans have come to see political opponents as enemies, tracing the anger to loneliness, unstable work, shallow news and outrage media, and sets out habits citizens can use to argue without demonizing.

Table of Content

If politics feels like a war between your side and a crowd of villains, Ben Sasse thinks the anger points to something deeper. In Them, Sasse, who holds a doctorate in American history and served in the US Senate, argues that Americans are turning on each other largely because the things that once gave them belonging are falling away: close friendships, steady work, a shared local life. Lonely and insecure people go looking for someone to blame, and plenty of voices are glad to supply an enemy.

His case is that this hostility grows from two roots, collapsing community and a news and campus culture that rewards contempt, and that ordinary citizens can push back against both. Along the way you get a name for the trick behind much outrage television, a reason to rethink how you follow the news, and a few plain standards for arguing hard with people without treating them as enemies.

Brain scans reveal that being left out registers in a surprising place. The finding explains why isolation shortens lives, and why one group of people is far more exposed to it than the rest.

A worker in the 1970s might spend a quarter century at one company. That world is gone, and the next wave of change could hit one of the most common jobs in America hardest.

Sasse was raised to treat following the news as a civic duty. Now he wonders whether he should give his own children the same advice, given what news has turned into.

Two obscure people posted something vile online, and a top-rated show made them the face of half the country. Sasse names the technique and explains why viewers keep coming back for more.

A Yale professor sent a mild email about Halloween costumes, and within a short time she and her husband were gone. Sasse uses the episode to ask what universities are teaching about disagreement.

Sasse borrows a locker-room speech from a 1990s football film to make his case for national repair. His remedies ask less of your opponents than of you and the people you vote for.

Sasse’s diagnosis runs from the private to the public. People who lose friends, steady work and local ties feel that loss in their bodies, and they become easy customers for anyone selling a simple enemy. Hurried news makes the world look simpler and scarier than it is. Pundits hold up the worst stranger on the internet as proof of the other side’s wickedness, and campuses teach young people to step away from disagreement altogether.

The repair he proposes is modest and personal, which is part of its appeal. Keep at least one friendship alive outside family and work, especially if you are a man who has let those slide. Swap some of your breaking alerts for one deeper story about a question you will actually vote on. When a clip makes you furious at a whole group, count how many people really said the outrageous thing. And ask of your own side the same honesty you demand from the other.

None of this requires agreeing with opponents. It requires remembering that they are neighbors, and that the country they share with you is bigger than any fight. Agreeing to disagree, in Sasse’s view, is where civic decency starts again.

About this book

What is this book about?

American public life has filled with contempt. Each side listens mostly to its own voices and pictures the other as wicked. Ben Sasse, a historian by training and a former US senator, argues that this rage is a symptom of something deeper: people are losing the friendships, steady jobs and local ties that once gave them a place to belong, and lonely, insecure people go looking for someone to blame. Sasse follows that loss from the body to the broadcast studio. He draws on brain scans showing that rejection registers like physical pain, and on research suggesting men are especially at risk of isolation. He tracks the collapse of long careers and the threat self-driving cars pose to millions of drivers. Then he turns to the forces that feed anger: a constant stream of thin news, pundits like Sean Hannity who parade obscure extremists as typical of the other side, and campuses where disagreement can end a career. Readers get a clear account of where polarization comes from and a set of plain standards for repairing it: debate without demonizing, judge your own side honestly, and learn to tell journalism from entertainment.

Book Information

Rating:

Genre:

Politics & Current Affairs, Social Issues

Topics:

Loneliness, Media, Sociology

Publisher:

Macmillan

Language:

English

Narrator:

Nora

First published:

October 16, 2018

Pages:

288

Length:

14 min 38 sec

Get the book:

Amazon

Who it's for

  • Tired of political rage

    Citizens worn out by political rage who want to understand where it comes from.

  • Angrier after the news

    Heavy news and social media users wondering why following events leaves them angrier, not wiser.

  • Keeping disagreement civil

    Teachers, parents and managers trying to keep disagreement civil in a classroom, home or team.

Listen to Preview

About the Author

Ben Sasse

Ben Sasse holds a Ph.D. in American history from Yale and also studied at Harvard and St. John's College. He taught at the University of Texas, served as an assistant secretary at the US Department of Health and Human Services under President George W. Bush, and led Midland University in Fremont, Nebraska. A Republican, he was elected to the US Senate in 2014 and re-elected in 2020, then left in January 2023 to head the University of Florida, stepping down in July 2024.

Ratings & Reviews

Ratings at a glance

4.4

Overall score based on 51 ratings.

What people think

Listeners find the text accessible and thoroughly researched, appreciating the way it fosters an understanding of diverse perspectives and emphasizes community bonds over political policy. Additionally, the writing is considered stimulating and polished, with one listener noting that it is liberally infused with thought-provoking quotations. Listeners also characterize the work as significant and absorbing, with one review labeling it an "Oasis of Sanity Inside Political Craziness." However, reactions to the pacing are divided, as some find the flow reasonably well-executed while others express disappointment.

Top reviews

Sin

Finally got around to reading Sasse's take on the national divide, and it’s a breath of fresh air. While he’s clearly a conservative, his main beef isn’t with the left; it’s with how we’ve replaced real community with 'politatainment' and digital echo chambers. He argues that our obsession with national politics is actually a symptom of our deep-seated loneliness. I found his prose easy to read and peppered with insightful historical context. Frankly, it’s refreshing to hear a politician admit that the government isn’t the solution to our fractured social lives. We need to turn off the screens and actually talk to our neighbors again. If you're tired of the constant outrage on Twitter, this book offers a much-needed perspective on how to be 'rooted' in a world that feels increasingly unmoored. Highly recommended for anyone looking to escape the cycle of anger.

Show more
Duangjai

As someone who feels politically homeless, I found Sasse's 'Them' to be an oasis of sanity amidst the usual partisan noise. He shifts the focus from policy debates to the fundamental human need for connection. The truth is, we are more isolated than ever, and Sasse correctly identifies how tech has exacerbated this. He doesn't offer a ten-point legislative plan, which might frustrate some, but that’s exactly the point. The healing has to happen at the dinner table, not the ballot box. I loved the emphasis on 'tribes' versus 'anti-tribes.' It made me realize how much of my own identity was built on what I hate rather than what I love. This is an important, engaging book for anyone worried about the future of the American soul.

Show more
Laor

Wow. Not what I expected from a politician. This isn't a stump speech; it's a deep, emotional dive into why we're all so miserable. Sasse identifies the opioid crisis and rising suicide rates as symptoms of a 'rootlessness' that technology only makes worse. We’ve traded real-life interaction for digital outrage, and it’s killing us. The prose is beautiful and the sentiment is sincere. I finished this feeling like I needed to go outside and apologize to my mailman for not knowing his name. It's a call to action that starts in your own backyard. Truly a convicting read.

Show more
Game

The chapter on the 'loneliness epidemic' alone is worth the price of admission. Sasse connects the dots between our digital lives and our declining mental health in a way that feels urgent. He isn't just complaining about 'kids these days' and their phones; he’s looking at how the very fabric of our society is tearing. His writing style is accessible yet sophisticated. I appreciated how he balanced data with personal anecdotes from his time in Nebraska. It’s an engaging read that doesn't feel like a typical political memoir. It made me rethink my own social media habits and the way I spend my free time. If you want to understand the 'why' behind the headlines, start here.

Show more
Jack

Sasse manages to be irenic and hopeful without being naive. As a Calvinist, he understands that we are all 'fallen,' and his solutions reflect that reality. He doesn't expect a utopia; he just wants us to be more human. The focus on people and place rather than screens is a message we all need to hear. It’s a short, punchy book that packs a heavy punch. Parents, especially, will find his insights on raising children in a tech-addled world very useful. He isn't just a politician; he’s a thinker. This is his best work yet.

Show more
Ratchada

This book acts as a mirror for our current social landscape, reflecting the 'pillow forts' of information we’ve built around ourselves. Sasse is a talented writer, and his research on the breakdown of local institutions is genuinely compelling. He makes a strong case that our anger toward the 'other side' is just a mask for the fact that we don't know our own neighbors anymore. However, the pacing is a bit uneven, and some chapters feel like they repeat the same point about technology a few too many times. To be fair, he offers a level-headedness that is rare in D.C. these days. It is a thought-provoking read that challenged me to put down my phone and engage with my community. Even if you don't agree with his policy stances, his cultural observations are hard to ignore.

Show more
Sukit

To be fair, Sasse is a Republican, so expect some conservative framing, but the core message transcends party lines. He nails the description of 'anti-tribes'—groups defined solely by who they hate. Personally, I found his critique of both Fox and MSNBC to be spot on, as both sides profit from keeping us perpetually angry and fearful. The book is liberally infused with thought-provoking quotations that keep you turning pages. It’s a reasonably well-executed look at sociology through a political lens. My only gripe is that he occasionally overlooks how historical structures have intentionally dismantled community for certain groups. Still, his plea for us to rediscover our 'common tribe' as Americans is incredibly timely. This should be required reading.

Show more
Arthit

Picked this up for a book club and was surprised by how much I agreed with, despite my liberal leanings. Sasse is clearly 'right of center,' but his sincerity is undeniable. He’s one of the few national figures trying to bridge the gap without being a total pushover. I found his discussion of 'politatainment' particularly stinging—we really do treat politics like a team sport for entertainment. Not gonna lie, some of his views on religious freedom felt a bit one-sided, but I appreciated his willingness to engage with the 'other' side. The book is well-researched and avoids the typical mud-flinging you see on cable news. It’s a rare moment of sanity in a very loud world.

Show more
Samart

Ever wonder why a sitting Senator would write a book that basically says politics can't save us? Sasse’s premise is fascinating, but his 'college president' background occasionally makes the tone feel a bit detached from the struggles of everyday working people. He talks about mobility as a choice, but for many in rural America, moving every four years isn't a luxury—it’s a desperate necessity for work. While he defines the 'loneliness epidemic' well, his solutions can feel a bit like preaching from an ivory tower. Look, he’s a brilliant guy and the book is well-written, but I’m not sure his 'middle-place' approach accounts for the raw vitriol many people face daily. It’s a good intellectual exercise, but it lacks the grit of lived experience. Worth a read for the historical analysis, though.

Show more
Emily

I wanted to like this, but it felt like a lecture from an elite who doesn't understand why people are actually angry. Sasse spends a lot of time redefining abstracts to fit his own pre-boxed interpretations of reality. He claims nobody watches the 'other side’s' media, but that’s just not true for those of us in rural areas where CNN is the only thing on in every waiting room. His 'nice-nice' approach to compromise feels like a retreat from core principles. Honestly, it’s short, which is the best thing I can say about it. He avoids the real policy lies that have hurt people for the last decade. It’s a lot of sociology and very little substance for someone living in the trenches of the current economy. Very disappointing.

Show more
Show all reviews

Questions about this book

Sasse argues that Americans increasingly hate each other because the sources of belonging are disappearing. Loneliness is rising, long careers have given way to job churn, and people search for someone to blame. News built for entertainment, pundits who single out obscure extremists and campuses that avoid disagreement all feed that anger. His remedy is a return to civility, honest standards for your own side and serious journalism.

Nutpicking is Sasse’s name for a media tactic: find an unknown person online saying something outrageous, then present them as typical of a whole group. His example is Sean Hannity’s coverage after the Las Vegas concert shooting, which highlighted a tweet from an apparent left-wing schoolteacher and a Facebook comment from an obscure lawyer as proof of the left’s moral character.

Sasse cites fMRI research showing that social rejection activates the same brain region as physical distress, so loneliness brings effects similar to chronic pain: weaker immunity, more stress hormones and higher heart disease risk. Lonely people get sick more often, recover more slowly and may face more dementia. He adds that men are especially exposed, since many stop making friends after marriage or career success.

Sasse’s steps are practical. Debate opponents without demonizing them. Judge politicians and commentators on your own side by the same rules as the other side, and distrust anyone framing problems as one group against another. Separate fact-based reporting from opinion entertainment, and favor in-depth coverage over short bursts. When a viral clip angers you, check how many people actually said the outrageous thing.

AUDIO SUMMARY AVAILABLE

Listen to Them in 15 minutes

Get the key ideas from Them by Ben Sasse, plus 5,000+ more nonfiction titles.

  • 5,000+ titles
  • Listen as much as you want
  • 7-day free trial
  • Cancel anytime

Them

Preview · Full summary 14 min 38 sec
Home

Discover

Open app

Log in